EXPLAINED: Abortion Research & Policy

The EXPLAINED: Abortion Research and Policy series features lectures with experts highlighting the impact of abortion restrictions on patients and providers in the United States. The short series contains 3-5 minute videos and colorful infographics. The lecture series features 8-12 minute videos with video companion guides.

If you would like to be able to assign this content to learners and track their progress, you can request a login for RHEcourse, our free online platform for SRH education, which offers additional features for users who want to engage more deeply. If you are a learner who would like to enroll in these courses for self-paced learning, you can request a RHEcourse login for self-paced learning.

IERH acknowledges the importance of inclusive language as a component of patient-centered care and we are working to improve our content. Read more here.

EXPLAINED: Lecture Series

EXPLAINED: State Regulations on Abortion Facilities Lecture

Dr. Sarah Roberts, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on state regulations on abortion facilities.

Don’t have time for the full lecture? Watch the short series version.

The following links provided the research used in this video:

  • Roberts SCM, Beam N, Liu G, Upadhyay UD, Leslie DL, Ba D, Kerns JL. Miscarriage Treatment-Related Morbidities and Adverse Events in Hospitals, Ambulatory Surgery Centers, and Office-Based Settings. J Patient Saf. 2018 Dec 3. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000553. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 30516583. 
  • Roberts SCM, Upadhyay UD, Liu G, Kerns JL, Ba D, Beam N, Leslie DL. Association of Facility Type With Procedural-Related Morbidities and Adverse Events Among Patients Undergoing Induced Abortions. JAMA. 2018 Jun 26;319(24):2497-2506. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7675. Erratum in: JAMA. 2018 Jul 24;320(4):409. PubMed PMID: 29946727; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6583042.
  • Berglas NF, Roberts SCM. The development of facility standards for common outpatient procedures and implications for the context of abortion. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3048-3. PubMed PMID: 29580284; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5870078.
  • Berglas NF, Battistelli MF, Nicholson WK, Sobota M, Urman RD, Roberts SCM. The effect of facility characteristics on patient safety, patient experience, and service availability for procedures in non-hospital-affiliated outpatient settings: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 5;13(1):e0190975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190975. eCollection 2018. Review. PubMed PMID: 29304180; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5755935.

EXPLAINED: Emotions Women Experience Post-Abortion in the United States Lecture

Corinne Rocca, PhD, MPH, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the emotions women express after having an abortion in the United States. Co-authors: Katrina Kimport, PhD; Heather Gould, MPH, John Neuhaus, PhD, Sarah Roberts, PhD, and Diana Greene Foster, PhD.

Download the Women’s Emotions Post-Abortion Lesson Plan Facilitator Guide.

Don’t have time for the full lecture? Watch the short series version and view the infographic.

The following sources provided the research used in this video:

Rocca CH, Kimport K, Gould H, Foster DG. Women’s emotions one week after receiving or being denied an abortion in the United States. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013 Sep; 45(3):122-31. PMID: 24020773

Rocca CH, Kimport K, Roberts SC, Gould H, Neuhaus J, Foster DG. Decision rightness and emotional responses to abortion in the United States: A longitudinal study. PLOS One. 2015; 10(7):e0128832. PMID: 26154386.

For more resources, please visit the Turnaway study’s annotated bibliography.

EXPLAINED: Effects of Abortion on Women’s Mental Health Lecture

Dr. Antonia Biggs, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on the effects of abortion on women’s mental health.

Download the EXPLAINED: Effects of Abortion on Women’s Mental Health Facilitator Guide with Quiz.

Don’t have time for the full lecture? Watch the short series version and view the infographic.

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Adler NE, David HP, Major BN, Roth SH, Russo NF, Wyatt GE. Psychological responses after abortion. 1990;248(4951):41-4.
American Psychological Association Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion. Report of the APA Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion. Washington, DC: The American Psychological Association; 2008.
Biggs MA, Gould H, Foster DG. Understanding why women seek abortions in the US. BMC Women’s Health. 2013;13(1):29.
Biggs MA, Upadhyay UD, Steinberg JR, Foster DG. Does abortion reduce self-esteem and life satisfaction? Qual Life Res. 2014;23(9):2505-13.
Charles VE, Polis CB, Sridhara SK, Blum RW. Abortion and long-term mental health outcomes: a systematic review of the evidence. Contraception. 2008;78(6):436-50.
Foster DG, Steinberg JR, Roberts SC, Neuhaus J, Biggs MA. A comparison of depression and anxiety symptom trajectories between women who had an abortion and women denied one. Psychol Med. 2015:1-10.
State policies in brief: Counseling and waiting periods for abortion. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; March 2016.
Koop CE. A measured response: Koop on abortion. Fam Plann Perspect. 1989;21(1):31-2.
National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health at the Royal College of Psychiatrists. Induced abortion and mental health: a systematic review of the mental health outcomes of induced abortion, including their prevalence and associated factors. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2011.
Robinson GE, Stotland NL, Nadelson CC. Abortion and mental health: guidelines for proper scientific conduct ignored. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;200(1):78-80.
Robinson GE, Stotland NL, Russo NF, Lang JA, Occhiogrosso M. Is there an ‘abortion trauma syndrome’? Critiquing the evidence. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2009;17(4):268-90.
Steinberg JR, Trussell J, Hall KS, Guthrie K. Fatal flaws in a recent meta-analysis on abortion and mental health. Contraception. 2012;86(5):430-7.
Stotland NL. Induced abortion and adolescent mental health. Curr Opin Obstet. Gynecol. 2011;23(5):340-3.

EXPLAINED: Impact of Restrictions on Clinical Practice Lecture

Dr. Carole Joffe, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on the impact of abortion restrictions on clinical practice.

Don’t have time for the full lecture? Watch the short series version and view the infographic.

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Borgmann CE. Abortion Exceptionalism and Undue Burden Preemption. Washington and Lee Law Review. 2014;71(2).
Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers. Guttmacher Institute; 2017.

EXPLAINED: Who Can Safely Provide Abortion? Lecture

Dr. Monica McLemore, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on who can safely provide abortions.

Download the EXPLAINED: Who Can Safely Provide Abortion? Facilitator Guide with Quiz.

Don’t have time for the full lecture? Watch the short series version and view the infographic.

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Aztlan-James EA, McLemore M, Taylor D. Multiple Unintended Pregnancies in U.S. Women: A Systematic Review. Womens Health Issues.
Freedman L, Battistelli MF, Gerdts C, McLemore M. Radical or routine? Nurse practitioners, nurse-midwives, and physician assistants as abortion providers. Reprod Health Matters. 2015;23(45):90-92.
McLemore M, Levi A. Nurses and care of women seeking abortions, 1971 to 2011. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2011;40(6):672-677.
McLemore MR, Desai S, Freedman L, James EA, Taylor D. Women know best–findings from a thematic analysis of 5,214 surveys of abortion care experience. Womens Health Issues. 2014;24(6):594-599.
McLemore MR, Kools S, Levi AJ. Calculus formation: nurses’ decision-making in abortion-related care. Res Nurs Health. 2015;38(3):222-231.
Taylor D, Postlethwaite D, Desai S, et al. Multiple determinants of the abortion care experience: from the patient’s perspective. Am J Med Qual. 2013;28(6):510-518.
Upadhyay UD, Desai S, Zlidar V, et al. Incidence of emergency department visits and complications after abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):175-183.
Weitz TA, Taylor D, Upadhyay UD, Desai S, Battistelli M. Research informs abortion care policy change in California. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(10):e3-4.

EXPLAINED: State Regulation of Medication Abortion Lecture

Dr. Ushma Upadhyay, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on the state regulation of medication abortion.

Download the EXPLAINED: State Regulation of Medication Abortion Facilitator Guide with Quiz.

Don’t have time for the full lecture? Watch the short series and view the infographic.

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Chong E, Frye LJ, Castle J, Dean G, Kuehl L, Winikoff B. A prospective, non-randomized study of home use of mifepristone for medical abortion in the U.S. 2015;92(3):215-219.
Clinical Practice Handbook for Safe Abortion. World Health Organization; 2014.
Greene MF, Drazen JM. A New Label for Mifepristone. N Eng J Med. 2016;374(23):2281-2282.
Grossman D, Grindlay K, Buchacker T, Lane K, Blanchard K. Effectiveness and acceptability of medical abortion provided through telemedicine. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(2 Pt 1):296-303.
Grossman DA, Grindlay K, Buchacker T, Potter JE, Schmertmann CP. Changes in service delivery patterns after introduction of telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Iowa. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(1):73-78.
Mitka M. Some men who take Viagra die–why? 2000;283(5):590, 593.
Ostapowicz G, Fontana RJ, Schiodt FV, et al. Results of a prospective study of acute liver failure at 17 tertiary care centers in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(12):947-954.
Spitz IM, Bardin CW, Benton L, Robbins A. Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States. N Eng J Med. 1998;338(18):1241-1247.
Upadhyay UD, Desai S, Zlidar V, et al. Incidence of emergency department visits and complications after abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):175-183.
Upadhyay UD, Johns NE, Combellick SL, Kohn JE, Keder LM, Roberts SC. Comparison of Outcomes before and after Ohio’s Law Mandating Use of the FDA-Approved Protocol for Medication Abortion: A Retrospective Cohort Study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(8):e1002110.
Winikoff B, Westhoff C. Fifteen years: looking back and looking forward. 2015;92(3):177-178.

EXPLAINED: Abortion Safety in the United States Lecture

Dr. Dan Grossman, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on abortion safety in the United States.

Download the EXPLAINED: Abortion Safety Facilitator Guide with Quiz.

Don’t have time for the full lecture? Watch the short series version and view the infographic.

 

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Grimes DA, et al. (2006). “Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic.
Texas Policy Evaluation Project: Research Brief. (2016). “Change in number of physicians providing abortion care in Texas after HB2.

EXPLAINED: Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers Lecture

Dr. Dan Grossman, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP Laws) in the United States.

Download the EXPLAINED: TRAP Laws Video Companion Guide.

Don’t have time for the full lecture? Watch the short series version and view the infographic.

 

The following links provided the research used in this video:

EXPLAINED: Turnaway Study Lecture

Dr. Diana Greene Foster, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research from the Turnaway Study.

Download the EXPLAINED: The Turnaway Study Video Companion Guide.

Don’t have time for the full lecture? Watch the short series version and view the infographic.

 

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Roberts SCM, Gould H, Kimport K, Weitz TA, Foster DG. Out-of-Pocket Costs and Insurance Coverage for Abortion in the United States. March 2014. Women’s Health Issues, (24)2:3211-218.
Biggs MA, Gould H, Foster DG. Understanding why women seek abortions in the US. July 2013. BMC Women’s Health, 13:29.
Foster DG, Gerdts C, Korenman S, Ralph L, Roberts SCM. Effect of being denied a wanted abortion on women’s socioeconomic wellbeing. APHA abstract. https://apha.confex.com/apha/144am/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/357932
Foster DG, Raifman S, Biggs MA. Effect of abortion receipt and denial on women’s existing and subsequent children. APHA abstract. https://apha.confex.com/apha/144am/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/357832
For more information, review the annotated bibliography.

EXPLAINED: Abortion On Screen Lecture

Gretchen Sisson and Katrina Kimport, of the University of California San Francisco, explain the most up-to-date research on abortion and it’s portrayal in film and television.

Download the EXPLAINED: Abortion on Screen Facilitator Guide with Quiz.

Don’t have time for the full lecture? Watch the short series version and view the infographic.

 

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Sisson G, Kimport K. “Depicting abortion access on American television, 2005-2015.” Feminism and Psychology. [in press]
Sisson G, Kimport K. “Doctors and Witches, Conscience and Violence: Abortion Provision on American Television.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016;48(4):161-8.
Sisson G, Kimport K. “Facts and fictions: Characters seeking abortion on American television, 2005-2014.Contraception. 2016;93(5):446-51.

EXPLAINED: Faith-Based Hospitals Lecture

Dr. Lori Freedman, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on abortion policy in faith-based hospitals.

Download the EXPLAINED: Faith-Based Hospitals Facilitator Guide with Quiz.

Don’t have time for the full lecture? Watch the short series version and view the infographic.

 

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Chan LM, Westhoff CL. “Tubal sterilization trends in the United States.Fertil Steril. 2010;94(1):1-6.
Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services.” United States Conference of Catholic Bishops; 2009.
Freedman LR, Landy U, Steinauer J. “When there’s a heartbeat: miscarriage management in Catholic-owned hospitals.Am J Public Health. 2008;98(10):1774-8.
Freedman LR, Stulberg DB. “Conflicts in Care for Obstetric Complications in Catholic Hospitals.AJOB Primary Research. 2013;4(4):1-10.
Guiahi M, Westhoff CL, Summers S, Kenton K. “Training at a faith-based institution matters for obstetrics and gynecology residents: results from a regional survey.J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(2):244-51.
Stulberg DB, Dude AM, Dahlquist I, Curlin FA. “Obstetrician-gynecologists, religious institutions, and conflicts regarding patient-care policies.” Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(1):73.e1-5.
Stulberg DB, Hoffman Y, Dahlquist IH, Freedman LR. “Tubal ligation in Catholic hospitals: a qualitative study of ob-gyns’ experiences.Contraception. 2014;90(4):422-8.
Stulberg DB, Jackson RA, Freedman LR. “Referrals for Services Prohibited In Catholic Health Care Facilities.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016;48(3):111-7.
Uttley L, Reynertson S, Kenny L, Melling L. “Miscarriage of medicine: the growth of Catholic hospitals and the threat of reproductive health care.” The MergerWatch Project; the American Civil Liberties Union; 2013.
Wall BM. “American Catholic hospitals: A century of changing markets and missions.” New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press; 2011.

EXPLAINED: Do Women Need More Time to Decide? Lecture

Dr. Sarah Roberts, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on abortion waiting periods in the United States.

Download the EXPLAINED: Waiting Periods Video Companion Guide.

Don’t have time for the full lecture? Watch the short series version and view the infographic.

 

The following links provided the research used in this video:

EXPLAINED: Parental Involvement Requirements Lecture

Dr. Lauren Ralph, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on the requirements of parental involvement in minors seeking abortion.

Download the EXPLAINED: Parental Involvement Requirements for Minors Seeking Abortion Facilitator Guide with Quiz.

Don’t have time for the full lecture? Watch the short series and view the infographic.

The following links provided the research used in this video:
Altindag O, Joyce T. Judicial Bypass for Minors Seeking Abortions in Arkansas Versus Other States. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(8):1266-1271.
Blum R, Resnick M, Stark T. The impact of a parental notification law on adolescent abortion decision making. Am J Public Health. 1987; 77:619-620.
Cartoof VG, Klerman LV. Parental consent for abortion: impact of the Massachusetts law. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:397-400.
Colman S, Joyce T. Minors’ behavioral responses to parental involvement laws: delaying abortion until age 18. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009;41:119-26.
Dennis A, Henshaw SK, Joyce T, Finer LB, Blanchard K. The impact of laws requiring parental involvment for abortion: A literature review. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute 2009.
Hasselbacher LA, Dekleva A, Tristan S, Gilliam ML. Factors influencing parental involvement among minors seeking an abortion: a qualitative study. Am J Public Health. 2014;104:2207-11
Henshaw SK, Kost K. Parental involvement in minors’ abortion decisions. Fam Plann Perspect. 1992;24:196-207, 13.
Joyce T, Kaestner R, Colman S. Changes in abortions and births and the Texas parental notification law. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1031-8.
Parental Involvement in Minors Abortion: State Policies In Brief. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2018.
Ralph L, King E, Belusa E, Foster DG, Brindis CD, Biggs MA. The impact of a parental notification requirement on Illinois minors’ access to and decision-making around abortion. J Adolesc Health. 2018; March
Roberts SC, Gould H, Kimport K, Weitz TA, Foster DG. Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States. Womens Health Issues. 2014;24:e211-8.
Upadhyay UD, Weitz TA, Jones RK, Barar RE, Foster DG. Denial of abortion because of provider gestational age limits in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2014;104:1687-94.

EXPLAINED: Short Series

EXPLAINED: State Facility Laws on Abortions Outside of Hospitals

Sara Daniel, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on state facility laws on abortions outside of hospitals.

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Jones, B. S., Daniel, S., & Cloud, L. K. (2018). State law approaches to facility regulation of abortion and other office interventions. American journal of public health, 108(4), 486-492.

EXPLAINED: State Regulations on Abortion Facilities

Dr. Sarah Roberts, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on state regulations on abortion facilities.

For more information, watch the extended lecture version and download the video companion materials.

The following links provided the research used in this video:

  • Roberts SCM, Beam N, Liu G, Upadhyay UD, Leslie DL, Ba D, Kerns JL. Miscarriage Treatment-Related Morbidities and Adverse Events in Hospitals, Ambulatory Surgery Centers, and Office-Based Settings. J Patient Saf. 2018 Dec 3. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000553. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 30516583. 
  • Roberts SCM, Upadhyay UD, Liu G, Kerns JL, Ba D, Beam N, Leslie DL. Association of Facility Type With Procedural-Related Morbidities and Adverse Events Among Patients Undergoing Induced Abortions. JAMA. 2018 Jun 26;319(24):2497-2506. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7675. Erratum in: JAMA. 2018 Jul 24;320(4):409. PubMed PMID: 29946727; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6583042.
  • Berglas NF, Roberts SCM. The development of facility standards for common outpatient procedures and implications for the context of abortion. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3048-3. PubMed PMID: 29580284; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5870078.
  • Berglas NF, Battistelli MF, Nicholson WK, Sobota M, Urman RD, Roberts SCM. The effect of facility characteristics on patient safety, patient experience, and service availability for procedures in non-hospital-affiliated outpatient settings: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 5;13(1):e0190975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190975. eCollection 2018. Review. PubMed PMID: 29304180; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5755935.

EXPLAINED: Emotions Women Experience Post-Abortion in the United States

Corinne Rocca, PhD, MPH, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the emotions women express after having an abortion in the United States. Co-authors: Katrina Kimport, PhD; Heather Gould, MPH, John Neuhaus, PhD, Sarah Roberts, PhD, and Diana Greene Foster, PhD.

For more information, watch the extended lecture version and download the video companion materials.

The following sources provided the research used in this video:

Rocca CH, Kimport K, Gould H, Foster DG. Women’s emotions one week after receiving or being denied an abortion in the United States. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013 Sep; 45(3):122-31. PMID: 24020773

Rocca CH, Kimport K, Roberts SC, Gould H, Neuhaus J, Foster DG. Decision rightness and emotional responses to abortion in the United States: A longitudinal study. PLOS One. 2015; 10(7):e0128832. PMID: 26154386.

For more resources, please visit the Turnaway study’s annotated bibliography.

EXPLAINED: Effects of Abortion on Women’s Mental Health

Dr. Antonia Biggs, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on the effects of abortion on women’s mental health.

For more information, watch the extended lecture version and download the video companion materials.

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Adler NE, David HP, Major BN, Roth SH, Russo NF, Wyatt GE. Psychological responses after abortion. 1990;248(4951):41-4.
American Psychological Association Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion. Report of the APA Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion. Washington, DC: The American Psychological Association; 2008.
Biggs MA, Gould H, Foster DG. Understanding why women seek abortions in the US. BMC Women’s Health. 2013;13(1):29.
Biggs MA, Upadhyay UD, Steinberg JR, Foster DG. Does abortion reduce self-esteem and life satisfaction? Qual Life Res. 2014;23(9):2505-13.
Charles VE, Polis CB, Sridhara SK, Blum RW. Abortion and long-term mental health outcomes: a systematic review of the evidence. Contraception. 2008;78(6):436-50.
Foster DG, Steinberg JR, Roberts SC, Neuhaus J, Biggs MA. A comparison of depression and anxiety symptom trajectories between women who had an abortion and women denied one. Psychol Med. 2015:1-10.
State policies in brief: Counseling and waiting periods for abortion. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; March 2016.
Koop CE. A measured response: Koop on abortion. Fam Plann Perspect. 1989;21(1):31-2.
National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health at the Royal College of Psychiatrists. Induced abortion and mental health: a systematic review of the mental health outcomes of induced abortion, including their prevalence and associated factors. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2011.
Robinson GE, Stotland NL, Nadelson CC. Abortion and mental health: guidelines for proper scientific conduct ignored. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;200(1):78-80.
Robinson GE, Stotland NL, Russo NF, Lang JA, Occhiogrosso M. Is there an ‘abortion trauma syndrome’? Critiquing the evidence. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2009;17(4):268-90.
Steinberg JR, Trussell J, Hall KS, Guthrie K. Fatal flaws in a recent meta-analysis on abortion and mental health. Contraception. 2012;86(5):430-7.
Stotland NL. Induced abortion and adolescent mental health. Curr Opin Obstet. Gynecol. 2011;23(5):340-3.

 

EXPLAINED: Impact of Restrictions on Clinical Practice

Dr. Carole Joffe, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on the impact of abortion restrictions on clinical practice.

For more information, watch the extended lecture version and download the video companion materials.

 

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Borgmann CE. Abortion Exceptionalism and Undue Burden Preemption. Washington and Lee Law Review. 2014;71(2).
Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers. Guttmacher Institute; 2017.

EXPLAINED: State Regulation of Medication Abortion

Dr. Ushma Upadhyay, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on the state regulation of medication abortion.

For more information, watch the extended lecture version and download the video companion materials.

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Chong E, Frye LJ, Castle J, Dean G, Kuehl L, Winikoff B. A prospective, non-randomized study of home use of mifepristone for medical abortion in the U.S. 2015;92(3):215-219.
Clinical Practice Handbook for Safe Abortion. World Health Organization; 2014.
Greene MF, Drazen JM. A New Label for Mifepristone. N Eng J Med. 2016;374(23):2281-2282.
Grossman D, Grindlay K, Buchacker T, Lane K, Blanchard K. Effectiveness and acceptability of medical abortion provided through telemedicine. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(2 Pt 1):296-303.
Grossman DA, Grindlay K, Buchacker T, Potter JE, Schmertmann CP. Changes in service delivery patterns after introduction of telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Iowa. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(1):73-78.
Mitka M. Some men who take Viagra die–why? 2000;283(5):590, 593.
Ostapowicz G, Fontana RJ, Schiodt FV, et al. Results of a prospective study of acute liver failure at 17 tertiary care centers in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(12):947-954.
Spitz IM, Bardin CW, Benton L, Robbins A. Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States. N Eng J Med. 1998;338(18):1241-1247.
Upadhyay UD, Desai S, Zlidar V, et al. Incidence of emergency department visits and complications after abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):175-183.
Upadhyay UD, Johns NE, Combellick SL, Kohn JE, Keder LM, Roberts SC. Comparison of Outcomes before and after Ohio’s Law Mandating Use of the FDA-Approved Protocol for Medication Abortion: A Retrospective Cohort Study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(8):e1002110.
Winikoff B, Westhoff C. Fifteen years: looking back and looking forward. 2015;92(3):177-178.

EXPLAINED: Who Can Safely Provide Abortion?

Dr. Monica McLemore, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on who can safely provide abortions.

For more information, watch the extended lecture version and download the video companion materials.

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Aztlan-James EA, McLemore M, Taylor D. Multiple Unintended Pregnancies in U.S. Women: A Systematic Review. Womens Health Issues.
Freedman L, Battistelli MF, Gerdts C, McLemore M. Radical or routine? Nurse practitioners, nurse-midwives, and physician assistants as abortion providers. Reprod Health Matters. 2015;23(45):90-92.
McLemore M, Levi A. Nurses and care of women seeking abortions, 1971 to 2011. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2011;40(6):672-677.
McLemore MR, Desai S, Freedman L, James EA, Taylor D. Women know best–findings from a thematic analysis of 5,214 surveys of abortion care experience. Womens Health Issues. 2014;24(6):594-599.
McLemore MR, Kools S, Levi AJ. Calculus formation: nurses’ decision-making in abortion-related care. Res Nurs Health. 2015;38(3):222-231.
Taylor D, Postlethwaite D, Desai S, et al. Multiple determinants of the abortion care experience: from the patient’s perspective. Am J Med Qual. 2013;28(6):510-518.
Upadhyay UD, Desai S, Zlidar V, et al. Incidence of emergency department visits and complications after abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):175-183.
Weitz TA, Taylor D, Upadhyay UD, Desai S, Battistelli M. Research informs abortion care policy change in California. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(10):e3-4.

EXPLAINED: Abortion Safety in the United States

Dr. Dan Grossman, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on abortion safety in the United States.

For more information, watch the extended lecture version and download the video companion materials.

 

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Grimes DA, et al. (2006). “Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic.
Texas Policy Evaluation Project: Research Brief. (2016). “Change in number of physicians providing abortion care in Texas after HB2.

EXPLAINED: Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers

Dr. Dan Grossman, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP Laws) in the United States.

For more information, watch the extended lecture version and download the video companion materials.

 

The following links provided the research used in this video:

EXPLAINED: Turnaway Study

Dr. Diana Greene Foster, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research from the Turnaway Study.

For more information, watch the extended lecture version and download the video companion materials.

 

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Roberts SCM, Gould H, Kimport K, Weitz TA, Foster DG. Out-of-Pocket Costs and Insurance Coverage for Abortion in the United States. March 2014. Women’s Health Issues, (24)2:3211-218.
Biggs MA, Gould H, Foster DG. Understanding why women seek abortions in the US. July 2013. BMC Women’s Health, 13:29.
Foster DG, Gerdts C, Korenman S, Ralph L, Roberts SCM. Effect of being denied a wanted abortion on women’s socioeconomic wellbeing. APHA abstract.
For more information, review the annotated bibliography.

 

EXPLAINED: Abortion On Screen

Gretchen Sisson and Katrina Kimport, of the University of California San Francisco, explain the most up-to-date research on abortion and it’s portrayal in film and television.

For more information, watch the extended lecture version and download the video companion materials.

 

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Sisson G, Kimport K. “Depicting abortion access on American television, 2005-2015.” Feminism and Psychology. [in press]
Sisson G, Kimport K. “Doctors and Witches, Conscience and Violence: Abortion Provision on American Television.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016;48(4):161-8.
Sisson G, Kimport K. “Facts and fictions: Characters seeking abortion on American television, 2005-2014.Contraception. 2016;93(5):446-51.

EXPLAINED: Faith-Based Hospitals

Dr. Lori Freedman, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on abortion policy in faith-based hospitals.

For more information, watch the extended lecture version and download the video companion materials.

 

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Chan LM, Westhoff CL. “Tubal sterilization trends in the United States.Fertil Steril. 2010;94(1):1-6.
Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services.” United States Conference of Catholic Bishops; 2009.
Freedman LR, Landy U, Steinauer J. “When there’s a heartbeat: miscarriage management in Catholic-owned hospitals.Am J Public Health. 2008;98(10):1774-8.
Freedman LR, Stulberg DB. “Conflicts in Care for Obstetric Complications in Catholic Hospitals.AJOB Primary Research. 2013;4(4):1-10.
Guiahi M, Westhoff CL, Summers S, Kenton K. “Training at a faith-based institution matters for obstetrics and gynecology residents: results from a regional survey.J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(2):244-51.
Stulberg DB, Dude AM, Dahlquist I, Curlin FA. “Obstetrician-gynecologists, religious institutions, and conflicts regarding patient-care policies.” Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(1):73.e1-5.
Stulberg DB, Hoffman Y, Dahlquist IH, Freedman LR. “Tubal ligation in Catholic hospitals: a qualitative study of ob-gyns’ experiences.Contraception. 2014;90(4):422-8.
Stulberg DB, Jackson RA, Freedman LR. “Referrals for Services Prohibited In Catholic Health Care Facilities.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016;48(3):111-7.
Uttley L, Reynertson S, Kenny L, Melling L. “Miscarriage of medicine: the growth of Catholic hospitals and the threat of reproductive health care.” The MergerWatch Project; the American Civil Liberties Union; 2013.
Wall BM. “American Catholic hospitals: A century of changing markets and missions.” New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press; 2011.

EXPLAINED: Waiting Periods – Do Women Need More Time to Decide?

Dr. Sarah Roberts, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on abortion waiting periods in the United States.

For more information, watch the extended lecture version and download the video companion materials.

 

The following links provided the research used in this video:

EXPLAINED: So-called “Abortion Reversal”

Dr. Monica McLemore, of the University of California San Francisco, explains what everyone needs to know about so-called “abortion reversal”.

To view more videos in our EXPLAINED series, visit the course page.

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Publications related to the Turnaway Study. (n.d.). Retrieved March 12, 2018, from https://www.ansirh.org/publications/turnaway

EXPLAINED: Why Study Design Matters

Dr. Monica McLemore, of the University of California San Francisco, explains why the study design for so-called “abortion reversal” studies is problematic.

To view more videos in our EXPLAINED series, visit the course page.

EXPLAINED: Parental Involvement Requirements for Minors Seeking Abortion

Dr. Lauren Ralph, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research on the requirements of parental involvement in minors seeking abortion.

For more information, watch the extended lecture version and download the video companion materials.

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Altindag O, Joyce T. Judicial Bypass for Minors Seeking Abortions in Arkansas Versus Other States. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(8):1266-1271.
Blum R, Resnick M, Stark T. The impact of a parental notification law on adolescent abortion decision making. Am J Public Health. 1987; 77:619-620.
Cartoof VG, Klerman LV. Parental consent for abortion: impact of the Massachusetts law. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:397-400.
Colman S, Joyce T. Minors’ behavioral responses to parental involvement laws: delaying abortion until age 18. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009;41:119-26.
Dennis A, Henshaw SK, Joyce T, Finer LB, Blanchard K. The impact of laws requiring parental involvment for abortion: A literature review. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute 2009.
Hasselbacher LA, Dekleva A, Tristan S, Gilliam ML. Factors influencing parental involvement among minors seeking an abortion: a qualitative study. Am J Public Health. 2014;104:2207-11
Henshaw SK, Kost K. Parental involvement in minors’ abortion decisions. Fam Plann Perspect. 1992;24:196-207, 13.
Joyce T, Kaestner R, Colman S. Changes in abortions and births and the Texas parental notification law. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1031-8.
Parental Involvement in Minors Abortion: State Policies In Brief. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2018.
Ralph L, King E, Belusa E, Foster DG, Brindis CD, Biggs MA. The impact of a parental notification requirement on Illinois minors’ access to and decision-making around abortion. J Adolesc Health. 2018; March
Roberts SC, Gould H, Kimport K, Weitz TA, Foster DG. Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States. Womens Health Issues. 2014;24:e211-8.
Upadhyay UD, Weitz TA, Jones RK, Barar RE, Foster DG. Denial of abortion because of provider gestational age limits in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2014;104:1687-94.

Course Development

Explained: Abortion Research and Policy is a project jointly conceived between Innovating Education in Reproductive Health and ANSIRH (Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health). The series translates ground-breaking research conducted by ANSIRH faculty into formats accessible by learners, clinicians, and policymakers. Videos explore the impact of abortion restrictions on the patients and providers in the United States. 

Production by the Innovating Education in Reproductive Health Team:

Stefanie Boltz, MPP
Jessie Chien
Felisa Preskill, MPP
Amanda Teal, MA

Graphic design and embedded motion graphics by Jessica Harrington
Videos filmed at UCSF by Kyle Van Auker
All content created by ANSIRH faculty featured in each video in conjunction with the IERH production team.