Presented by: Michalle Ramirez-McLaughlin, RN, MS, FNP-BC
University of California, San Francisco

Click here to download this video lecture and here to download the lesson plan/facilitator guide with quiz.

Additional Resources/Citations

Tiers of Efficacy Chart. Beyond the Pill.

CDC Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use.

Presented by: Shokoufeh Dianat, DO
University of California, San Francisco

Click here to download this video lecture  and here to download the facilitator guide with quiz.

Click here to download the EC Decision Tree used in this video

Citation

_{Haeger et al. 2018; Glasier et al. 2011; Edelman et al. 2018; Kapp et al. 2015}

Presented by:

Christine Dehlendorf, MD, MAS
University of California, San Francisco

Presented by Suzan Goodman MD, MPH
National Training Director, Bixby Beyond the Pill Program
Associate Clinical Professor, UCSF

Dr. Diana Greene Foster, of the University of California San Francisco, explains the most up-to-date research from the Turnaway Study.

Download the EXPLAINED: The Turnaway Study Video Companion Guide.

Don’t have time for the full lecture? Watch the short series version and view the infographic.

The following links provided the research used in this video:

Video Lecture Presented by:

Click here to download this video lecture

Lecture can be viewed with subtitles in Spanish or French. French translation was made possible by the Safe Abortion Action Fund and International Planned Parenthood Federation. Click the Closed Captions button on video lectures to access subtitles. 

Video Lecture Presented by:

University of New Mexico

Additional Resources

Revised code of Ethics in 2015

The ICN code of Ethics for Nurses

Click here to download this video lecture

Lecture can be viewed with subtitles in Spanish or French. French translation was made possible by the Safe Abortion Action Fund and International Planned Parenthood Federation. Click the Closed Captions button on video lectures to access subtitles. 

Video Lecture Presented by:

University of California, San Francisco

Additional Resources

Guttmacher state laws and policy regarding conscientious refusal in the United States

FIGO guidelines on conscientious objection

Center for Reproductive Rights Law and Policy, Guide on Conscientious Objection (International Perspective)

Click here to download this video lecture 

Lecture can be viewed with subtitles in Spanish or French. French translation was made possible by the Safe Abortion Action Fund and International Planned Parenthood Federation. Click the Closed Captions button on video lectures to access subtitles. 

Video Lecture Presented by:

University of California, San Francisco
Click here to download this video lecture

This web-based Medical Student Professional Responsibility Module is intended to help learners develop skills to manage their own judgmental feelings in patient interactions by encouraging empathy, compassion, or acceptance. This exercise was developed as a values clarification exercise for use with medical students. The Digital Interactive Family Planning Module is designed for individual use on smartphones, tablets, and computers. This module can complement a group setting or be used as a stand-alone tool.

This resource explains different birth control methods for people across the gender spectrum, with a focus on the effects of different forms of birth control on those taking gender-affirming hormones such as testosterone.

Find this resource here!

Structures & Self is a learner-led, justice-informed curriculum designed to teach learners to consider how systems of power and legacies of oppression impact their care for patients.

Resources

_{Medical Apartheid}

_{Medical Bondage}

_{Anarcha and the Mothers of Modern Gynecology}

_{Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites}

_{HRD-77-3 Investigation of Allegations Concerning Indian Health Service}

_{Forced Sterilization of Native Americans: Later Twentieth Century Physician Cooperation with National Eugenic Policies?}

_{California was sterilizing its female prisoners as late as 2010}

_{Disproportionate Sterilization of Latinos Under California’s Eugenic Sterilization Program, 1920–1945}

_{Killing the Black Body}

_{How False Beliefs in Physical Racial Difference Still Live in Medicine Today – The New York Times}

Citations

_{Prevalence of HIV and healthcare experiences among people of transgender experience}

• _{Becasen JS, Denard CL, Mullins MM, Higa DH, Sipe TA. Estimating the prevalence of HIV and sexual behaviors among the US transgender population: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2006–2017. AmJ Public Health e1-e8.}
• _{James, S. E., Herman, J. L., Rankin, S., Keisling, M., Mottet, L., & Anafi, M. (2016). The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality.}

Resources

_{Healthy People 2020}

_{Structural Competency} 

Citations

_{Racial residential segregation is associated with higher rates of preterm birth for Black women}

• _{Salow AD, Pool LR, Grobman WA, Kershaw KN. Associations of neighborhood-level racial residential segregation with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):351.e1-351.e7. doi: 10}

_{Physicians spend less time with clinically obese patients and fail to refer them for diagnostic tests compared to thinner patients.}

• _{Phelan SM, Burgess DJ, Yeazel MW, Hellerstedt WL, Griffin JM, van Ryn M. Impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and outcomes for patients with obesity. Obes Rev. 2015 Apr;16(4):319-26. doi: 10.1111/obr.12266. Epub 2015 Mar 5. PubMed PMID: 25752756; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4381543.}

Resources

_{“Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack” by Peggy McIntosh}

_{Implicit Bias Test}

Citations

_{Implicit bias among providers}

• _{FitzGerald C, Hurst S. Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 1;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8. PubMed PMID: 28249596; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5333436.}

_{Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations}

• _{Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2013.}
• _{Cleeland CS, Gonin R, Baez L, Loehrer P, Pandya KJ. Pain and treatment of pain in minority patients with cancer. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Minority Outpatient Pain Study. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(9):813–816.}
• _{Goyal MK, Kuppermann N, Cleary SD, Teach SJ, Chamberlain JM. Racial disparities in pain management of children with appendicitis in emergency departments. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(11):996–1002.}
• _{Hoffman KM, Trawalter S, Axt JR, Oliver MN. Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 19;113(16):4296-301. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516047113. Epub 2016 Apr 4. PubMed PMID: 27044069; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4843483.}

Resources

_{Community-informed models of perinatal and reproductive health services provision: a justice-centered paradigm toward equity among Black birthing communities}

_{Yo, is this racist?}

_{Black Women Birthing Justice Project}

_{Blueprint for Sexual and Reproductive Health, Rights, and Justice}

_{Freedom School for Intersectional Medicine and Health Justice}

_{Black Mamas Matter}

_{How do I … respond when I see racial abuse in public?}

_{Medical Legal Partnership}

_{White Coats for Black Lives}

_{Beyond Flexner}

_{Social Medicine Consortium}

_{Pod Save the People}

_{The Body is Not An Apology}

_{The New Jim Crow}

_{Disability Visibility Project}

_{Everyday Feminism}

Citations

_{Bronfenbrenner’s Social Ecological Model}

• _{Bronfenbrenner, Urie (1989). “Ecological systems theory”. In Vasta, Ross (ed.). Annals of Child Development: Vol. 6. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. pp. 187–249.}

Co-hosted by SisterSong and RHEDI, this webinar will provide: an introduction to the Reproductive Justice framework and its core principles; a brief history of reproductive oppression; and a deeper understanding of intersectionality.

Click here for more community education resources from RHEDI!

The Patient has the Answer Summary: Only the patient is the expert in their life and needs.

Liberation summary: Healthcare providers may have bias favoring a particular decision, but the patient owns the decision and ultimately it does not impact the providers life.

Not a Failure Summary:

• A patient who returns for a second or greater abortion indicates that the clinic and staff provided high-quality service and supported the patient.
• Viewing repeat patients as “failures” contributes to abortion shame and stigma.

The Approach Summary :

• Patient-centered counseling uses this approach: Listen, don’t assume, self-reflect.
• Patients and providers may not share understanding of complex medical terms.